The Bodhisattva Vow
Mutual becoming in Indra's Net
Indra's Net is a metaphorical concept that originates from Mahayana Buddhism, particularly within the Avatamsaka Sutra (or Flower Garland Sutra). It illustrates the interconnectedness and interdependence of all things in the universe. The metaphor envisions a vast, cosmic net owned by the god Indra, with a jewel at each intersection or node of the net. Each jewel reflects all the other jewels in the net, and each reflection contains the reflection of all the other jewels, ad infinitum.
This image serves as a symbol for the idea that every part of the universe is intimately connected to every other part, and that each individual element contains within it the entirety of the whole. In this way, it emphasizes the Buddhist concept of "dependent origination" (pratītyasamutpāda), which suggests that all phenomena arise in dependence upon other phenomena, and nothing exists in isolation.
Indra's Net has also been interpreted and used as a metaphor in various philosophical contexts, including process philosophy, to illustrate the radical interconnection of all entities in the web of existence. It's often employed to highlight the notion that the universe is a dynamic, interwoven system where every part affects and is affected by the whole. The net is not static. It is a process of mutual becoming or inter-becoming.
*
The Bodhisattva Vows, as discussed below, come to life in the jewels of Indra's Net: in how people treat each other, the more-than-human world, and themselves. These vows are about the intimacies of inter-becoming, highlighting how humans can relate to one another and the natural world with compassion and a sense of interconnectedness, without turning one another into solidified "things."
Practicing them does not mean "becoming one" as if dissolved into a mystical unity in which all differentiations dissolve; nor does it mean being "just two" as if mutually independent, like separate balls on a pool table. Instead, people are together yet different, different yet together. In moments when they embody this spirit of mutuality—of togetherness and difference—they become momentary Bodhisattvas. They need not identify as Buddhists; still, something within them awakens, either implicitly or explicitly, to an ultimacy of togetherness that is within them yet more than them.
In Bodhisattva moments, the illusions of separateness fall away, as do the illusions of mystical oneness. They are not the same and not separate. This "not the same and not separate" is always in process. It is what Buddhists and process theologians mean by inter-becoming. Process theologians affirm that the living whole of the universe, God, is the supreme example of, not exception to, this inter-becoming. God is a cosmic Bodhisattva who vows to save all sentient beings and help end delusions of separateness. God enters all dharma gates, even the most hellacious ones, with loving hands and invites all to walk the way of wisdom and compassion. The way is unsurpassable and yet always surpassing itself. It never ends.
- Jay McDaniel
This image serves as a symbol for the idea that every part of the universe is intimately connected to every other part, and that each individual element contains within it the entirety of the whole. In this way, it emphasizes the Buddhist concept of "dependent origination" (pratītyasamutpāda), which suggests that all phenomena arise in dependence upon other phenomena, and nothing exists in isolation.
Indra's Net has also been interpreted and used as a metaphor in various philosophical contexts, including process philosophy, to illustrate the radical interconnection of all entities in the web of existence. It's often employed to highlight the notion that the universe is a dynamic, interwoven system where every part affects and is affected by the whole. The net is not static. It is a process of mutual becoming or inter-becoming.
*
The Bodhisattva Vows, as discussed below, come to life in the jewels of Indra's Net: in how people treat each other, the more-than-human world, and themselves. These vows are about the intimacies of inter-becoming, highlighting how humans can relate to one another and the natural world with compassion and a sense of interconnectedness, without turning one another into solidified "things."
Practicing them does not mean "becoming one" as if dissolved into a mystical unity in which all differentiations dissolve; nor does it mean being "just two" as if mutually independent, like separate balls on a pool table. Instead, people are together yet different, different yet together. In moments when they embody this spirit of mutuality—of togetherness and difference—they become momentary Bodhisattvas. They need not identify as Buddhists; still, something within them awakens, either implicitly or explicitly, to an ultimacy of togetherness that is within them yet more than them.
In Bodhisattva moments, the illusions of separateness fall away, as do the illusions of mystical oneness. They are not the same and not separate. This "not the same and not separate" is always in process. It is what Buddhists and process theologians mean by inter-becoming. Process theologians affirm that the living whole of the universe, God, is the supreme example of, not exception to, this inter-becoming. God is a cosmic Bodhisattva who vows to save all sentient beings and help end delusions of separateness. God enters all dharma gates, even the most hellacious ones, with loving hands and invites all to walk the way of wisdom and compassion. The way is unsurpassable and yet always surpassing itself. It never ends.
- Jay McDaniel