Introduction
Process philosophy can be understood as encompassing three distinct yet interrelated types, which we might think of as forming the vertices of a triangle. Each type offers a unique orientation within the broader field of process thought, while remaining dynamically connected to the others.
The first type is speculative process philosophy, exemplified by thinkers like John Cobb and David Griffin. This approach is deeply interested in Alfred North Whitehead's metaphysical worldview, particularly as articulated in Process and Reality. Speculative process philosophers seek to explore the broader implications of Whitehead’s metaphysical ideas, including his doctrine of God, for understanding reality in a systematic and comprehensive way.
The second type is empirical process philosophy, represented by figures such as Bernard Meland and Bernard Loomer. This approach is less focused on Whitehead’s metaphysical system or theological claims and more attentive to the insights that process thought brings to the study of lived experience. Empirical process philosophers emphasize Whitehead’s contributions to understanding processes like feeling, contrast, beauty, and creativity as they appear in human life and the natural world.
The third type is mathematical process philosophy, which prioritizes Whitehead’s use and development of symbolic logic as a tool for understanding the nature of reality. This approach is primarily concerned with Whitehead’s mathematical and logical contributions, treating them as a language for exploring the deep structures of existence. It is less focused on his theological ideas (as in speculative philosophy) or their application to lived experience (as in empirical philosophy), instead highlighting his technical innovations in logic and their implications.
Together, these three types form the vertices of a triangle--speculative, empirical, and mathematical. This triangular structure helps us see how each orientation provides a distinct perspective while contributing to the larger field of process philosophy. A thinker might align more closely with one vertex or find themselves situated somewhere within the triangle, blending aspects of all three. The metaphor emphasizes their interdependence and the richness they collectively bring to process thought.
The first type is speculative process philosophy, exemplified by thinkers like John Cobb and David Griffin. This approach is deeply interested in Alfred North Whitehead's metaphysical worldview, particularly as articulated in Process and Reality. Speculative process philosophers seek to explore the broader implications of Whitehead’s metaphysical ideas, including his doctrine of God, for understanding reality in a systematic and comprehensive way.
The second type is empirical process philosophy, represented by figures such as Bernard Meland and Bernard Loomer. This approach is less focused on Whitehead’s metaphysical system or theological claims and more attentive to the insights that process thought brings to the study of lived experience. Empirical process philosophers emphasize Whitehead’s contributions to understanding processes like feeling, contrast, beauty, and creativity as they appear in human life and the natural world.
The third type is mathematical process philosophy, which prioritizes Whitehead’s use and development of symbolic logic as a tool for understanding the nature of reality. This approach is primarily concerned with Whitehead’s mathematical and logical contributions, treating them as a language for exploring the deep structures of existence. It is less focused on his theological ideas (as in speculative philosophy) or their application to lived experience (as in empirical philosophy), instead highlighting his technical innovations in logic and their implications.
Together, these three types form the vertices of a triangle--speculative, empirical, and mathematical. This triangular structure helps us see how each orientation provides a distinct perspective while contributing to the larger field of process philosophy. A thinker might align more closely with one vertex or find themselves situated somewhere within the triangle, blending aspects of all three. The metaphor emphasizes their interdependence and the richness they collectively bring to process thought.