Flowing Beneath the Surface
Sociologists Look at "Social Love" in Daily Life
For a review of the field, click here.
For descriptions of recent books, scroll down.
In process philosophy, love is central—not merely a divine attribute but the fabric of our connections with others when we are at our best. There is something nourishing and life-giving about love, especially when gratituitous - as in buying a cup of coffee for a stranger.
Thomas Oord defines love "as acting intentionally, in sympathetic response to others, to promote overall well-being." Is it possible that the seeds of overall well-being already exist in daily life? The emerging field of the sociology of love proposes that they do. Sociologists are exploring how love is embedded in societal structures and practices. Works like Social Love and the Critical Potential of People, edited by Silvia Cataldi and Gennaro Iorio, and Iorio’s The Sociology of Love highlight this. As the publisher's description of Iorio's book puts it:
Thomas Oord defines love "as acting intentionally, in sympathetic response to others, to promote overall well-being." Is it possible that the seeds of overall well-being already exist in daily life? The emerging field of the sociology of love proposes that they do. Sociologists are exploring how love is embedded in societal structures and practices. Works like Social Love and the Critical Potential of People, edited by Silvia Cataldi and Gennaro Iorio, and Iorio’s The Sociology of Love highlight this. As the publisher's description of Iorio's book puts it:
“The reality we live in is impregnated with love. The challenge is to recognize it and to call things by their proper name; gratuity, overabundance, and creativity are aspects that we experience in everyday life, but they are also expressions of small-great heroisms, which offer an alternative to instrumentalism, uncertainty, and consumerism, typical of contemporary social life.”
This field amplifies Thomas Oord’s notion of “overall well-being.” The phrase calls us to consider not only the good of individuals but the common good of communities and the world. At the same time, the sociology of love shows that love is not only an individual act; it is an already existing social reality - not the whole of social reality, but a nourishing part of it.
In this sense, so sociologists say, social love is like a karst river: a stream that flows partly or entirely underground through soluble bedrock—such as limestone, dolomite, or gypsum—quietly carving out caves and hidden channels. Similarly, social love is an already existing current, flowing beneath the surface of social life and history, subtly but persistently reshaping the public world. Sociologists suggest that this current becomes visible through four interrelated and, in principle, observable dimensions: overabundance, care, recognition, and universalism - all of which are being studied and in many instances promoted in contemporary research.
Overabundance names acts of giving that exceed expectations of reciprocity—such as mutual aid, hospitality, or forgiveness—that open new relational possibilities.
Care refers to the ongoing, concrete responsibility for the well-being of others, as seen in caregiving relationships, community support networks, and practices that sustain life over time.
Recognition affirms others as unique subjects of experience rather than reducing them to roles or categories, evident, for example, in inclusive forms of dialogue and policies that honor dignity.
Universalism extends concern beyond one’s immediate circle to include strangers, outsiders, and the more-than-human world, as in movements for global justice or ecological care.
Importantly, so sociogists of love inside, these are not rare or exceptional occurrences. Sociological research suggests that one or more of these dimensions is present, often quietly, in the micro-practices of everyday life. They form an undercurrent within many societies—frequently unnoticed, yet continually at work.
In this way, Oord’s idea of “overall well-being” gains new depth. It refers not only to personal moral action but also to the the karsty rivers of daily life, quietly effective at a collective scale. If there is hope for the world, it may be in these rivers.

