https://www.centeratwestpark.org/
Theatre of the Ordinary
Anton Chekhov, Process Philosophy, and
the Quiet Dignity of Unrealized Dreams
Anton Chekhov (1860-1904), along with Henrik Ibsen (1828-1906) and August Strindberg (1849-1912), helped develop a tradition in theatre sometimes called Realism or, as I prefer, the Theatre of the Ordinary. Other playwrights, such as Arthur Miller (1915-2005) and Tennessee Williams (1911-1983), took Realism even further by focusing on the subtle, often uneventful lives of ordinary people. Unlike the dramatic exploits typical of Romanticism, Chekhov's plays center on the small, often unfulfilled desires of his characters, emphasizing the quiet desperation that often underlies everyday existence. His characters are not heroes but rather individuals caught in the mundane struggles of life, seeking meaning and connection in a world that often feels indifferent to their hopes and dreams.
In The Seagull (1896), Chekhov presents a group of characters, each grappling with their own unrealized ambitions and unrequited loves. Konstantin dreams of creating innovative theatre, Nina yearns for fame as an actress, and Arkadina clings to her fading stardom. Unlike the grand, transformative journeys of Romantic heroes, their pursuits are marked by disappointment, disillusionment, and a sense of stagnation. Chekhov’s portrayal of these characters, who are unable to achieve their dreams and find themselves bound by the ordinariness of life, serves as a critique of Romantic idealism, suggesting that reality is often far more complicated and less rewarding than the lofty visions of the Romantic imagination. How might this be understood and appreciated from a process perspective?
In process-relational philosophy, the universe is not a value-free void waiting for humans to give it meaning. Instead, it is inherently filled with values—ideals like truth, beauty, harmony, and peace are woven into the fabric of existence. Every being, from atoms to animals to people, contributes to this unfolding tapestry of value, striving in its own way for some form of achievement. Sometimes, this achievement is grand, like an act of compassion or creativity; other times, it’s simply the achievement of survival.
Human life, however, is also filled with failures—unmet dreams, disappointments, and moments where we fall short of our ideals. But even these moments hold value. They become part of our story, part of what it means to live well in a world of struggle. As Anton Chekhov so vividly shows in his stories, there is dignity in failure, in the striving and enduring. Sometimes, the greatest achievement is simply to keep going, to survive and integrate the beauty and pain of our experience. In this way, we celebrate not only the victories but the resilience in the face of loss, turning even failure into an aesthetic achievement.
Chekhov’s characters are not heroes but individuals caught in the mundane struggles of life, seeking meaning and connection in a world that often feels indifferent to their hopes and dreams. In The Seagull, Chekhov presents a group of characters, each grappling with their unrealized ambitions and unrequited loves. Chekhov’s Uncle Vanya (1899), Three Sisters (1901), and The Cherry Orchard (1904) continue this exploration of ordinary lives weighed down by unrealized potential. In Uncle Vanya, the characters endure the slow passage of time, wrestling with disillusionment and a longing for something more. In Three Sisters, the siblings yearn for a return to Moscow, which symbolizes a happier past and an unfulfilled promise of a better life. Their dreams remain unrealized, yet they persist, embodying Chekhov’s empathy for the resilience of the human spirit despite inevitable disappointments.
Unlike the heroic protagonists of earlier dramatic traditions, Chekhov’s characters often fail to take decisive action, and their emotions are expressed not in grand speeches but in subtle gestures, silences, and the things left unsaid. His emphasis on subtext—the underlying emotions and motivations that are never directly spoken—allows audiences to sense the deep wells of longing and despair beneath the surface of seemingly mundane conversations. This focus on the unspoken inner life was revolutionary, emphasizing that the true drama of human existence often lies not in spectacular events but in the internal, unvoiced struggles that define us.
In this way, the "Theatre of the Ordinary" invites audiences to find beauty and meaning in the everyday, challenging the notion that only extraordinary events are worthy of artistic exploration. Chekhov’s work is a reminder that the small, uncelebrated moments of life—the shared silences, the quiet yearning, the routines that both comfort and constrain—are themselves achievements in their way, achievements that include failure. His plays urge us to recognize that within the quiet desperation of ordinary lives lies a truth about the human condition: that even without grand triumphs or dramatic transformations, the search for connection and purpose is a deeply moving, if often understated, endeavor.
In process-relational philosophy, this quest for connection and purpose is intrinsic to the nature of existence. Every being, in its striving, its failures, and its small achievements, contributes to the ongoing process of becoming. The universe itself is a theatre of the ordinary, filled with moments of both grandeur and quiet struggle. It is in the resilience, in the continuation of life despite obstacles, that the beauty of existence is found. This perspective, like Chekhov's theatre, asks us to see value not only in the grand acts of compassion and creativity but also in the simple persistence to endure, to continue, and to transform even the smallest experiences into something meaningful.
- Jay McDaniel with help from OpenAI
In The Seagull (1896), Chekhov presents a group of characters, each grappling with their own unrealized ambitions and unrequited loves. Konstantin dreams of creating innovative theatre, Nina yearns for fame as an actress, and Arkadina clings to her fading stardom. Unlike the grand, transformative journeys of Romantic heroes, their pursuits are marked by disappointment, disillusionment, and a sense of stagnation. Chekhov’s portrayal of these characters, who are unable to achieve their dreams and find themselves bound by the ordinariness of life, serves as a critique of Romantic idealism, suggesting that reality is often far more complicated and less rewarding than the lofty visions of the Romantic imagination. How might this be understood and appreciated from a process perspective?
In process-relational philosophy, the universe is not a value-free void waiting for humans to give it meaning. Instead, it is inherently filled with values—ideals like truth, beauty, harmony, and peace are woven into the fabric of existence. Every being, from atoms to animals to people, contributes to this unfolding tapestry of value, striving in its own way for some form of achievement. Sometimes, this achievement is grand, like an act of compassion or creativity; other times, it’s simply the achievement of survival.
Human life, however, is also filled with failures—unmet dreams, disappointments, and moments where we fall short of our ideals. But even these moments hold value. They become part of our story, part of what it means to live well in a world of struggle. As Anton Chekhov so vividly shows in his stories, there is dignity in failure, in the striving and enduring. Sometimes, the greatest achievement is simply to keep going, to survive and integrate the beauty and pain of our experience. In this way, we celebrate not only the victories but the resilience in the face of loss, turning even failure into an aesthetic achievement.
Chekhov’s characters are not heroes but individuals caught in the mundane struggles of life, seeking meaning and connection in a world that often feels indifferent to their hopes and dreams. In The Seagull, Chekhov presents a group of characters, each grappling with their unrealized ambitions and unrequited loves. Chekhov’s Uncle Vanya (1899), Three Sisters (1901), and The Cherry Orchard (1904) continue this exploration of ordinary lives weighed down by unrealized potential. In Uncle Vanya, the characters endure the slow passage of time, wrestling with disillusionment and a longing for something more. In Three Sisters, the siblings yearn for a return to Moscow, which symbolizes a happier past and an unfulfilled promise of a better life. Their dreams remain unrealized, yet they persist, embodying Chekhov’s empathy for the resilience of the human spirit despite inevitable disappointments.
Unlike the heroic protagonists of earlier dramatic traditions, Chekhov’s characters often fail to take decisive action, and their emotions are expressed not in grand speeches but in subtle gestures, silences, and the things left unsaid. His emphasis on subtext—the underlying emotions and motivations that are never directly spoken—allows audiences to sense the deep wells of longing and despair beneath the surface of seemingly mundane conversations. This focus on the unspoken inner life was revolutionary, emphasizing that the true drama of human existence often lies not in spectacular events but in the internal, unvoiced struggles that define us.
In this way, the "Theatre of the Ordinary" invites audiences to find beauty and meaning in the everyday, challenging the notion that only extraordinary events are worthy of artistic exploration. Chekhov’s work is a reminder that the small, uncelebrated moments of life—the shared silences, the quiet yearning, the routines that both comfort and constrain—are themselves achievements in their way, achievements that include failure. His plays urge us to recognize that within the quiet desperation of ordinary lives lies a truth about the human condition: that even without grand triumphs or dramatic transformations, the search for connection and purpose is a deeply moving, if often understated, endeavor.
In process-relational philosophy, this quest for connection and purpose is intrinsic to the nature of existence. Every being, in its striving, its failures, and its small achievements, contributes to the ongoing process of becoming. The universe itself is a theatre of the ordinary, filled with moments of both grandeur and quiet struggle. It is in the resilience, in the continuation of life despite obstacles, that the beauty of existence is found. This perspective, like Chekhov's theatre, asks us to see value not only in the grand acts of compassion and creativity but also in the simple persistence to endure, to continue, and to transform even the smallest experiences into something meaningful.
- Jay McDaniel with help from OpenAI
